Transliteration is always a strange thing, but it is especially complicated in Ukraine, where roughly one-sixth of the population is ethnic Russian, speaking Russian, and yet another sixth are ethnic Ukrainian, but speak Russian too. It's become especially difficult recently, as numerous of the protesters inside the capital are Ukrainian-speaking, taking for the streets last November when President Viktor Yanukovych - a Russian-speaker from Ukraine's east - turned away from E.U. membership toward an arrangement with Russia's Eurasian Union.
Given a medical history of Russian domination, both throughout the Soviet period and before, it's understandable that language has turned into a serious problem in the united kingdom. One obvious demonstration of here is the Western practice of speaking about the country as "the Ukraine" rather than "Ukraine." You'll find myriad reasons until this is wrong and offensive, but possibly the most convincing is the word Ukraine emanates from that old Slavic word "Ukraina," which roughly meant "borderland." Many Ukrainians think that the "the" implies they're simply a portion of Russia - "little Russia," as they are sometimes known by their neighbors - instead of an actual country. The Western habit of using "the Ukraine" to consult the nation - even by those sympathetic on the protesters, like Senator John McCain- is viewed as ignorant at best.
On the outside, the Kiev/Kyiv debate seems similar, even though it is way less heated. A state language of the us is Ukrainian. The town, within the predominantly Ukrainian-speaking west of the united states, had its name standardized to Kyiv in Roman letters from the Ukrainian government way back in 1995, just four years once they formally asked the planet to please stop saying 'the Ukraine.' The planet listened, with an extent - the U.S. Board on Geographic Names (BGN) approved the spelling 'Kyiv' in the year 2006 after a request through the Ukrainian government (and subsequent endorsement from the State Department).
It isn't that easy, however. For starters, through the years there's been a number of different spellings from the English names for the city; Wikipedia lists no less than nine. In 1995, Andrew Gregorovich from the FORUM Ukrainian Review argued that as "Kiev" was based on a classic Ukrainian-language name for the location, and that Kyiv as well as other potential Roman transliterations - such as Kyjiv and Kyyiv - were confusing for English speakers, Kiev was simply fine. The BGN still allows Kiev to be used, arguing that 'Kyiv' is only a "an exception on the BGN-approved romanization system that is certainly placed on Ukrainian geographic names in Ukrainian Cyrillic script."
More info about ukrainian translator go to see this useful web portal.